![]() |
Pan American experiences
|
------- |

Americas |
AMERICAS ------------------------------------------516[FEATURE] | |||
"Breaking All Immunity Rules"Colombian President Petro Harshly Criticizes the US After Visa Revocation; Calls for the UN to Relocate from New YorkBy Jazmin Agudelo for Ruta Pantera on 10/17/2025 7:50:03 AM |
||||
| In a diplomatic showdown evoking Cold War-era tensions, Colombian President Gustavo Petro has escalated his confrontation with the United States to unprecedented levels. On September 27, 2025, mere hours after the U.S. State Department revoked his visa for "reckless" actions during a pro-Palestinian protest in New York, Petro not only dismissed the measure as an "attack on sovereignty" but labeled it a blatant violation of diplomatic immunity norms. In a flurry of X posts and official statements, the leftist leader urged the United Nations to abandon its Manhattan headquarters and relocate to a "neutral country," arguing that U.S. presence undermines global impartiality. "Breaking all the rules of immunity, the US shows that New York is no longer neutral territory for humanity," Petro wrote, sparking a storm of reactions from Latin American support to disbelief in Washington. This episode, blending climate activism and geopolitics, exposes cracks in the hemispheric alliance and questions the UN's role in a multipolar world. The trigger was a fiery speech on September 26 during the 80th UN General Assembly. Petro, in New York to advocate for Colombia's energy transition and peace agenda, joined a pro-Palestinian rally at Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza alongside activists like former Pink Floyd vocalist Roger Waters. Addressing thousands through a megaphone in Spanish—with live translation—Petro rallied: "I ask U.S. soldiers not to point their rifles at humanity. Disobey Trump's orders and obey global conscience!" His words evoked a "world salvation army" against the "genocide in Gaza," going viral with millions of views. For the State Department, this crossed a red line: seen as inciting military insubordination, it violated sedition laws and threatened national security. "Petro urged US soldiers to disobey orders and incite violence; we revoke his visa immediately," the agency tweeted, citing the Immigration and Nationality Act. | ||||
|
|
Petro, undeterred, fired back from his flight to Bogotá at 10:00 a.m. on the 27th. In a barrage of X posts blending personal defiance with institutional critique, he declared: "I don***t care about the visa; I***m a world citizen with a Spanish passport. But this breaks all immunity rules: a head of state on official mission can***t be sanctioned for speaking in UN territory." Invoking the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations—which guarantees absolute immunity during international functions—Petro accused the U.S. of weaponizing its UN host status to "impose imperial agendas." His boldest proposal: "The UN must move from New York to a neutral country like Switzerland or Costa Rica, where protests don***t end in visa reprisals." Colombia***s Foreign Ministry backed the motion, sending a formal note to Secretary-General António Guterres, claiming the current headquarters "compromises the organization***s credibility." This isn***t an isolated spat but the climax of a year of frictions. Since Trump***s 2024 reelection, Petro has clashed ideologically: rejecting mass deportation flights in February, vetoing 25% tariffs on Colombian exports in April, and mutual accusations of interference in July—when Petro alleged a "gringo plot" against his government—have eroded bilateral ties. Colombia, the top recipient of U.S. anti-drug aid at $500 million annually, relies economically on Washington, yet Petro has pivoted to the Global South: BRICS alliances with Brazil and criticisms of Israel in multilateral forums. The visa revocation—symbolic, as Petro had already departed—feels in Bogotá like a warning: "Silence or isolation." Analysts like former Colombian ambassador to Washington Luis Alberto Moreno warn it could cost $2 billion in disrupted trade from indirect reprisals. International reactions form a mosaic of solidarity and skepticism. In Latin America, leaders like Brazil***s Lula da Silva and Mexico***s Claudia Sheinbaum praised Petro, with Lula tweeting: "Diplomatic immunity is non-negotiable; the US must retract." In Europe, EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas voiced "concern" over the precedent, recalling Vienna protections for dignitaries. Guterres sidestepped direct confrontation, but his spokesperson reaffirmed New York***s headquarters as a "pillar of neutrality, open to dialogue." In Washington, backlash was fierce: Republican Senator Ted Cruz called it a "well-deserved lesson for a socialist," while Democrats like Bernie Sanders decried the "disproportion," comparing it to immunity granted Netanyahu despite his controversial UN remarks. Legally, Petro***s case raises profound dilemmas. International law experts like Georgetown***s Harold Koh argue the visa was a "tactical error": Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration Act allows revocations for "foreign policy threats," but not for heads of state in diplomatic transit. Vienna Article 39 extends immunity "throughout the function period," covering Petro***s protest as an extension of his Assembly role. Colombia could sue at the International Court of Justice for treaty violations, though it would take years. "It***s a dangerous precedent: what***s next, arrests in Geneva?" Koh ponders in a recent analysis. The implications ripple far. For Petro, it***s a rhetorical win: his domestic approval rose three points per Invamer polls, solidifying his "Global South defender" image. Economically, Colombia hedges by diversifying: exports to China surged 15% in 2025. Globally, it accelerates UN debates: "rotating headquarters" proposals gain traction in the G77, and Belém***s COP30 could amplify Latin voices. Yet escalation risks loom: Trump has hinted at "additional measures" if Petro persists in Israel critiques. Ultimately, this clash reveals a shifting world order. Petro, the ex-guerrilla turned president, embodies resistance to U.S. unipolarity, while Trump upholds an "America First" doctrine without compromise. Like García Márquez***s tales where reality outstrips fiction, New York—symbol of multilateral utopia—becomes a dystopian diplomatic stage. Will the UN relocate? Unlikely short-term. But Petro***s call echoes: in a fractured planet, neutrality isn***t a luxury but survival. As he tweeted: "Humanity doesn***t fit in visas; it fits in principles." In October 2025, with the U.S. Supreme Court busy on its own cases, the world watches if principles prevail over passports. | |||
|
Click on images to enlarge:
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
×
|
||||
Please leave a comment about this article: 516 |
|
| Enter your email address: |
Your email will not be displayed. |
| Your nickname: | |
| Your comment: | |
| Was this article helpful to you? | |
|
|
|
Articles about exciting travel experiences in our hemisphere.


